Sunday, September 1, 2013
Hole of Justice: Crime Does Pay
Hole of Justice: Crime Does Pay: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea Crime does pay!! Iloilo Press Club past Pres. Rommel S. Ynion has filed a graft c...
Crime Does Pay
Hole of Justice
By Peter G. Jimenea
Crime does pay!!
Iloilo Press Club past Pres. Rommel S. Ynion has filed a graft case
against mayor (now congressman) Jerry Trenas, et al, for the grossly overpriced
16.2 hectares land purchased by the city as relocation site for squatters.
Trenas was still the mayor when this deal took place in 2006. It is an
agricultural land situated at San Isidro, Jaro, Iloilo City, first valued at
P2.7M but was bought later by the city government for P63.2M.
On why, only God knows. But no Ombudsman report as a result of their probe
where the subplot of bribery stinks. The real estate broker exposed this in
2009 irked by the prodding of influential people wanting to have a share of the
loot!
The boss as he described is Capone of his time. He sees to it that those
who cooperated are rewarded and those who did not are discriminated against - a
collusion of crooks who overtly professed what they covertly undertake.
He also said that those involved in this contemptuous deal are the city
mayor, the city treasurer, the city assessor, the ICUPAO head, a city councilor,
the lot owner and himself (the real estate broker) too.
It took me too much time transforming the issue into what it becomes
today – a scroll that forms the basis of blasphemy. This recurring mess that
had consumed the city for years seems not good for the Ombudsman as no crooks
has received the spanking they deserved for this stupidity!
A relocation site of squatters at Barangay Lanit, Jaro, Iloilo City is also
said to have been paid in full but to date the title was not yet transferred to
the city government. DAR officials may have something to say about this!
That
is not only what we are looking for. Here’s another for the heart, the Iloilo City
government low cost housing project at its own lot in Pavia town, Iloilo. Its
construction was a big sorry and that city government lot is now endangered of
becoming the last casualty!
To recall, the project was bankrolled by the P120M loan for the
construction of 413 units of houses for poor city hall employees. It started in
2001, first term of mayor Trenas and ended in 2009 without even a unit standing
and completed. A hao shiao!
Worse, the Ombudsman found no probable cause to indict the mayor in this project.
Even a fish vendor can say the unlawful payment of the mayor to the contractor
violates R.A. 3019, or the Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act.
What’s more, the Ombudsman-Visayas knew that lowly city hall employees
are the most sorely tempted to steal but don’t. Yet, he fears to touch the cases
filed by the taxpayers against the errant local officials at his office.
Senator Franklin Drilon, whether he admits it or not, is widely believed the
one coddling and protects the undesirable underlings he had been tapping. But this
tolerance to misdeed is malum in se -
evil in itself!
Worse, they cling to power by election cheatings. This CPP-NPA claim is
shared by the media. This is a crime that cries to God for justice. Qui
peccat ebrius luat sobrius – he who offends when drunk shall be punished
when sober. God knows….. see the title!
Hole of Justice: A Messy Police Business
Hole of Justice: A Messy Police Business: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea A Messy Police Business Somew...
A Messy Police Business
Hole of Justice
By Peter G. Jimenea
A Messy Police Business
Somewhere in this city, a prisoner
with pending case escaped from jail and the police jail guard on-duty was in
hot-water. He is already in the brink of insanity when he found an absurd way
to get out of the mess he’s in.
A friend-judge helped him with a
solution so simple. Pay the amount of the recommended bail bond for the temporary
liberty of the escapee, post it to the court and presto, problem solved!
Yaaaks…Capone of their time. The
police jail-guard got-off the hook easily than the police in this story did - SPO3
Jenny Zacarias, Criminal Investigation Service of the Western Police District
Command, Manila.
Jenny was tasked to guard Alfredo
“Joey” de Leon, leader of the notorious “Red Scorpion Group.” Unfortunately, De
Leon escaped from his cell with another prisoner Nicanor Atractivo, who is charged
in a robbery with homicide case.
On how De Leon escaped, Jenny has yet
to say. But it spawned the filing of a case for inefficiency in the performance
of duty against him. Under par. (c), Section 42 of R.A. 6975 or the PNP Law,
the charge is a ground for Summary Dismissal.
And so it was. But the order of the
PNP chief was contested by Jenny. He averted that the Summary Dismissal Order
against him was without due process and based merely on substantial evidence.
As a result, this police mess has travelled
a long way from the PNP Chief to NAPOLCOM, the National Adjudication Board (NAB)
and to the Court of Appeals, until it finally reached the Supreme Court.
Section 42, Summary Dismissal Powers
of the PNP Chief and Regional Directors: After due notice and summary hearings,
they may immediately remove or dismiss any respondent PNP member in any of the
following cases;
(a)
When the charge is serious
and the evidence of guilt is strong.
(b)
When the respondent is
recidivist or has been repeatedly charged and there are reasonable grounds to
believe that he is guilty of the charges.
(c)
When the respondent is
guilty of conduct unbecoming of a police officer.
Jenny contends the charges
neglect of duty, inefficiency and incompetence in the performance of official
duties charged against him cannot be classified under any of the three cases
enumerated above.
Hence, without due process
and the PNP Chief and the (NAB) cannot dismiss him summarily from the service. But
the essence of due process is simply an opportunity to be heard or, as in administrative
proceedings, the opportunity to explain. In fact, the motion for
reconsideration of Jenny has already cured all the defects of due process.
Conduct unbecoming of a
police officer refers to any behaviour or action of a PNP member in his
official capacity, which dishonours himself and seriously compromises his
character in a manner that indicates a corrupt state of moral character;
It may also refer to acts
or behaviour of any PNP member in his unofficial or private capacity that compromises
his position as a police officer and exhibits himself as unworthy to remain a
member of the organization.
Substantial evidence;
“relevant evidence that reasonable mind may accept as adequate to support
conclusion. The CA cannot substitute its own judgment or criterion for that of
the administrative body in determining where lies the weight of evidence or
what evidence is to believe.” (Velasquez vs. Nery, 211 SCRA 28,34,35)
Thus, the SC upheld the
decision of both the NAB and the Court of Appeals in confirming the order of
the Chief PNP for the summary dismissal of PO3 Jenny Zacarias from the police
service. (G.R. No. 119847, October 24, 2003).
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)