Tuesday, October 27, 2015
Hole of Justice: The Dismissed 19 PNP Officers
Hole of Justice: The Dismissed 19 PNP Officers: Hole of Justice by Peter G. Jimenea The Dismissed 19 PNP Officers On June 02, 2015, the Ombudsman dismissed nineteen (19) top PNP...
The Dismissed 19 PNP Officers
Hole
of Justice
by
Peter G. Jimenea
The Dismissed 19 PNP Officers
On June 02,
2015, the Ombudsman dismissed nineteen (19) top PNP officials from service due
to the P5M rubber-boat scam. Among them are S/Supt. Cornelio Salinas, Director
of the Iloilo Provincial Police Office (IPPO) and also former IPPO Dir. C/Supt.
Reynaldo Rafal.
THE CASE. In
2009, the PNP National HQ issued a resolution for the procurement of
watercrafts for the Maritime Goup. A budget of P5M was approved for 20 units.
By that time S/Supt. Salinas was then with Maritime Command (MARICOM).
As I cannot
contact Salinas, I called C/Supt. Rafal who had been a Director of Logistics
Support Services (LSS) on March 31, 2010. He claimed the delivery of the boats
was on March 22, 2010, at least a week before he assumed his Directorial post.
As the LSS Director,
he said to have signed the Disbursement Voucher because all certifications were
properly attached to it, the inspection, acceptance, availability of funds,
accounting office certification, etc. But it is not his duty to personally
check the boat in Navotas Pier.
To check the
delivery, the bidding process and selection of supplier is the duty of the
Maritime Group, a separate unit as mandated by the NHQ, PNP Maritime Group. Contrary
to report, those are not rubber-boats but boats made of fiberglass reinforced
by lumber and marine plywood with bamboo outriggers (katig).
He said the
Maritime Group created the BAC, conducted the bidding and select the supplier.
There was no indication of possible problem at that time since the deal was
worth P4.5M while the approved ABC (budget of the contract) is P5M. So although
the boats were reduced in number from 20 to 16, the government has saved P.5M.
When the
rubber-boats were delivered and inspected on March 22, 2010, according to the
Ombudsman, they found the following defects; 1). No oil pressure and water
temperature gauges, a speedometer and other essential parts of a rubber boat uninstalled.
Hence, a case was filed against all people involved in the deal.
Like Rafal, S/Supt.
Salinas is a dedicated police officer in service. But the Ombudsman knew
nothing about them. She has only that large propensity to act based on raw intelligence
data to prosecute than to praise government employees.
According to
C/Supt. Rafal, he was never interviewed personally by any graft investigator on
this case. He was only required to file his counter affidavit and yet, he was
also dismissed like the other top PNP officers without proper investigation of
his involvement.
The
Ombudsman has failed to promote efficient service as provided for in Sec. 13 of
RA 6770 or the Ombudsman Act of 1989. It failed to use properly its
investigatory and prosecutor powers to inquire and obtain information sufficient
to support a resolution.
Why run
after the police officers for the P4.5M anomaly and ordered only to set aside
the P137M Iloilo City Housing Scam of Liberal Party stooges in the city? Are
cases against administration crooks not good for the Court?
Look at the
length of time spent by the Office of the Ombudsman to investigate this P4.5M
alleged rubber-boat anomaly. Baloney! Five years has caused prolonged anxiety to
litigant-police officers whose future and that of the family were forcibly tied
to litigation.
Summum jus,
summum injuria – extreme enforcement of law may lead to injustice. Good that the
Court values liberty and will always insist on the observance of basic
Constitutional rights as a condition sine qua non against the extremely abusive
investigative and prosecutor powers of the government. (Berico vs CA, 225 SCRA
562).
In G.R.
191411, Coscolluela vs. Ombudsman, the Court reprimanded the Ombudsman for deliberate
delay in resolving cases. It is their responsibility to expedite the case
within the bounds of reasonable time in view of its mandate to promptly act on
all complaints lodged before it.
As
pronounced in the case of Barker v. Wingo: A defendant has no duty to bring himself to trial; the State has
that duty as well as the duty of insuring that the trial is consistent with due
process. And a conduct of proper investigation is one. Due to delay, the cases against
Coscolluela et al. were eventually dismissed.
Ombudsman’s
reliance on raw intelligence data is bad. It is only for lazy graft-investigators
and government crooks that what she did is good. See the injustice to police officer
for that P4.5M mess? What about the DAP and PDAF of crooks in billions when the
SC says these are unconstitutional?
Why is she
so silent about it? Let us presumed she is not bias but who are the indicted
administration allies? Just don’t make the family of the dismissed police
officers hungry or someday they will run amuck. Remember, a hungry stomach
knows no law!
Sunday, October 25, 2015
Hole of Justice: Ombudsman Raw Intel Data
Hole of Justice: Ombudsman Raw Intel Data: Hole of Justice by Peter G. Jimenea The Ombudsman Raw Intel Data In 2009, the PNP National HQ issued a resolution for the procure...
Hole of Justice: Ombudsman Raw Intel Data
Hole of Justice: Ombudsman Raw Intel Data: Hole of Justice by Peter G. Jimenea The Ombudsman Raw Intel Data In 2009, the PNP National HQ issued a resolution for the procure...
Ombudsman Raw Intel Data
Hole of
Justice
by Peter G.
Jimenea
The Ombudsman
Raw Intel Data
In 2009, the
PNP National HQ issued a resolution for the procurement of watercrafts for the
Maritime Goup. A budget of P5M was approved for 20 units and a bidding was held
but failed, hence, the procurement by administration.
On 2010, instead
of 20 units at pegged price of 250,000 each, the PNP paid to the supplier Four
Petals Trading a P4.5 million for the 16 units of watercrafts costing 312,000
each. The reduction of four units gave the MARICOM a savings of P.5M as
reported.
When the
rubber-boats were delivered and inspected on March 22, 2010, the Ombudsman
found out the following defects; 1). No oil pressure and water temperature
gauges, a speedometer and other parts essential to a rubber boat. A case was
filed against all people involved in the deal.
On June 02,
2015 a consolidated decision was promulgated dismissing nineteen (19) top PNP
officials from service due to involvement in the P5M rubber-boat transaction. One
is S/Supt. Cornelio Salinas, Director of the Iloilo Provincial Police Office
(IPPO).
S/Supt. Salinas
is widely believed a dedicated police officer in service and a good leader by
example for subordinates who are lucky to wear the police uniform they are so
proud of. But the Ombudsman seemed to have overlooked the real details of the investigation
report.
The P4.5M watercrafts
are not rubber-boats as described in the news report. They are made of
fiberglass, reinforced by lumber and marine plywood with outriggers (katig)
made of bamboo. And the mentioned other lacking parts are not that essential to
install.
Beside
which, some of the police officers linked by the Ombudsman were not personally
interviewed by graft-investigators as to veracity of the anomaly reported. They
were only required to file counter-affidavits, nothing more.
The
Ombudsman has failed to promote efficient service to the people as provided for
in Sec. 13 of RA 6770 or the Ombudsman Act of 1989. It failed to use its
investigatory and prosecutor powers to inquire and obtain information to
institute and implement measures.
Why run
after the police officers forP4.5M anomaly and skipped the P137M Iloilo Housing
Scam of the administration stooges in the city? Are cases against
administration crooks not good for theOmbudsman Court?
While the
Ombudsman has the full discretion to determine whether or not a criminal case should
be filed, the Supreme Court (SC) is not precluded from reviewing the Ombudsman
action when there is an abuse of discretion. (Garcia-Rueda vs. Pascasio, 278
SCRA 769).
Just look at
the length of time spent by the Office of the Ombudsman to investigate this
P4.5M alleged rubber-boat anomaly. The five years has caused prolonged anxiety
to the litigant-police officers and have tied their assets and other properties
to litigation.
But the
Court values liberty and will always insist on the observance of basic
Constitutional rights as a condition sine qua non against the extremely abusive
investigative and prosecutor powers of the government. Summum jus, summum
injuria – extreme enforcement of law may lead to injustice. (Berico vs CA, 225
SCRA 562).
In G.R. 191411,
Coscolluela vs. Ombudsman, the SANDIGANBAYAN SECOND DIVISION reprimanded the
Ombudsman that it is their responsibility to expedite the case within the bounds
of reasonable timeliness in view of its mandate to promptly act on all
complaints lodged before it.
As
pronounced in the case of Barker v. Wingo: A defendant has no duty to bring himself to trial; the State has
that duty as well as the duty of insuring that the trial is consistent with due
process. Due to delay it ordered to dismiss the case against Coscolluela et al.
Omb Conchita
Carpio Morales should not rely on raw intelligence data of her people. It is
only for her lazy investigators and the real crooks that what she did is good. The
law says; “it is safer to err in acquitting than in punishing.” Now can she feel
the agony of this injustice to the rightful police officer?
Thursday, July 16, 2015
Hole of Justice: Hong Kong a British Colony
Hole of Justice: Hong Kong a British Colony: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea How Hong Kong Became a British Colony (3 rd of a Series) During the 1800s, European powers f...
Hong Kong a British Colony
Hole
of Justice
By
Peter G. Jimenea
How Hong Kong Became a British Colony
(3rd of a Series)
During the 1800s, European powers
funded their colonial ambitions through narcotics. Britain led the drive. The British
are the most organized drug traffickers in history. They Import opium from
India and targeted China’s millions of people as principal market.
Prior to the British campaign, China
has a small number of opium smokers, leftovers of the Dutch efforts. The
British became the first Western government to traffic in narcotics due to big
profits as shown in their 20% of the India’s opium revenues.
Despite the Emperor’s objection,
Indian opium shipments increased, so did the number of addicts. The Chinese
banned opium but British captains of the Soldier-Merchant-Executives of London
ignored the ban. They sailed into different Chinese ports to unload the stuff.
From 200 tons in 1800s, the opium
shipments increased to 2,000 tons in 1840. The Chinese resented the British
colonial aspirations. Though the Ch’ing Dynasty was politically weak they seized
and destroyed $6 million of opium and arrested some British traders.
Those arrested were exiled in the freezing
Central Asia and one was even crucified and shown publicly at Canton docks as a
warning to British traders. The British exploded when Cantonese officials
dumped thousands of kilos of opium into the sea during the Far Eastern Boston
Tea Party.
The British responded by shelling the
coastline and a full-scale wars between Britain and China erupted in 1839 to 1856.
But Chinese junks and rusted canons have no match against the powerful fleets
of the enemies. The dubbed “Opium Wars” resulted to a full British victory.
China became powerless to stop the
opium trade and worse, it was also obliged to pay the British a costly
war-reparation. Unable to pay the cost, they ceded Hong Kong to British
control. This is how Kong Kong became a British colony. Soon addiction spread
from China to Southeast Asia, Europe and the United States.
Britain made opium the world’s largest
cash commodity. When the demand overtook supply, the Chinese government, which
by then badly need of funds, finally tolerates domestic opium cultivation in
two provinces. By 1900, it turned a blind eye to a yearly production of 20,000
tons.
During the late 1800s, a new breed of
colonizers from Europe divided Asia into colonies, protectorates and spheres of
influence. Laos and Cambodia became French-Indochina. Burma and Thailand became
a British boundary separating it from the French territory.
The 1911 people revolution led by Mao
Tse-tung ended the imperial government and a new republic was formed. But it
only worsened the problem. Without a strong Central government to provide,
powerful military warlords controlled the cultivation and exports of opium.
But not until a New People’s Republic
of China was formed that put everything in place. Hong Kong residents feel
living on a borrowed time. The perceived the fantasies of Lifestyle of the Rich
and Famous will soon be over. Only few have the faintest idea of this upcoming
event.
The Joint Declaration signed between
the People’s Republic of China and Great Britain states that Hong Kong shall be
returned to China by 1997. On July 1997,
Hong Kong was returned to Mainland China as agreed and its residents became
restive.
Mostly affected are drug lords and
drug syndicates thriving in Hong Kong. They knew the Mainland Chinese have a simple
solution to drug problem – a bullet in the head done in public. Thus, drug
lords were forced to migrate to the East and the West to play safe.
Others picked the Philippines as
country of choice after knowing the corruptibility of our public officials.
They knew drug money can buy judges, prosecutors, police and military officers,
government workers politicians and even barangay leaders. The problem is they also
bring their wares with them!
Next issue: Illegal Drugs as backbone
of the Triads
Hole of Justice: The Chinese Triads (Part 2 of a Series)
Hole of Justice: The Chinese Triads (Part 2 of a Series): Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea History of the Triads (Part 2 of a series} The Chinese Triad is a secret society with over 40...
The Chinese Triads (Part 2 of a Series)
Hole of Justice
By Peter G. Jimenea
History of the Triads (Part 2 of a
series}
The Chinese Triad is a secret society
with over 400 years of history behind it. Triad has a noble purpose when
organized. They resented the occupation of the Northern part of China by the invading
barbarian Manchus of Mongolia.
Triad societies are represented by an
equilateral triangle signifying three basic concepts of Heaven, Earth and Man.
They were founded as patriotic secret organization to overthrow the foreign
conquerors and restore the Ming dynasty to the imperial throne.
About 1,500 years before Christ, these
societies were founded in 17th century thirty years after the
Manchus, (barbarian tribesmen from Mongolia) invaded China, swept over “the
Great Wall” and placed the Northern part of the country in their domination.
The Manchus has an iron grip in
two/thirds of Northern China but continued to face rebellion in the South. The
rallying point for the anti-Manchus sentiment in the South is the Foochow
monastery of the 128 militant monks who organized the local population into
pocket of resistance.
By 1674, the Manchus consolidated
their hold on Northern China and send large contingents of armed troops to the
south. But the monks who had developed the form of self-defense called kung fu,
held the Manchus out for almost three weeks.
A traitor among the monks, however, help the Manchus disguised as waterboys to
enter the secret underground tunnels into the monastery. Only 18 of monks
escaped the slaughter but they were hunted by the Manchus brutally killing 13
of them.
The five remaining monks were
credited for the first Triad society to drive the Manchus away from their
lands. The secret societies have the spread like fever across Southern China
and continue to thrive with a slogan “Armies protect the Emperor, Triads
protect the people.”
The Triads tried several aborted
revolutions like “The Urban Uprising,” “Taiping Rebellion” and others until the
many radical critics of the Manchus joined them. By mid-1800 the Triads
existence were threatened that large segments of their members migrated to
foreign lands.
Out there they learned to engage in
illegal activities to survive. The Mainland Triads sent members abroad to organize
and protect the various kinds of vices and crimes that thrived among their homeless
members. By the late 1800s, the Triads’ big income was sent to China to help
the revolution.
In 1911, the Manchus were overthrown
and a Republic was established. Dr. Sun yat-sen formed the first government
being a senior Triad member. He is assisted by Charlie Soong, financier and
member of the powerful “Red Gang,” and Army General Chiang Kai-shek who lost to
Mao Tse-tung in 1949.
As they spread control over China’s
underworld as well as in foreign countries, Gen. Chiang gave the Triads
unprecedented opportunity to gain recognition and powers in national politics.
His ambition was to lead China as the military chief of the new Imperial
dynasty.
A litmus test for his new leadership
was Gen. Chiang’s attempt to eliminate the Communist-led labor unions in
Shanghai, the largest city in Southern China. He ordered the closure of the
newspapers considered critical to him and the arrest of left-wing leaders and
spokespersons of labor unions.
The oppressive government of Gen.
Chiang sparked the 1949 revolution led by Mao Tse-tung. Chiang fled to Formosa
(now Taiwan) with his few army generals leaving behind the others like Gen. Li
who opened the Golden Triangle story to the new world.
Next issue: How Hong Kong became a
British Colony.
Hole of Justice: History of Illegal Drugs (First of a Series)
Hole of Justice: History of Illegal Drugs (First of a Series): Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea History of Illegal Drugs (First of a Series) It is imperative for our peaceful citizens to kn...
History of Illegal Drugs (First of a Series)
Hole of Justice
By Peter G. Jimenea
History of Illegal Drugs (First of a
Series)
It is imperative for our peaceful
citizens to know the menace brought about by illegal drugs to society. I started writing about illegal drugs in 1994
but nobody inquires as they knew nothing about it. Now they do, after illegal drugs
become a national problem and worse, a global crisis.
This story refers to the Chinese
Triads. Most of the documented information herein are based on the book Warlord
of Crime by a US investigative journalist Gerard Fosner. He is the only writer
allowed by the 14K Gang Triads to visit its headquarter in Hong Kong.
With the exception of the vast
majority of hardworking and honest Chinese, I have no intent to slight them. As
a matter of fact, they deserved my praises as the Chinese race and culture are at
the forefront since the inception of written history.
This delves only on the unfortunate
segment of the Chinese race- the Chinese Triads. They have a systematic and
vicious control of large, illicit empires in the criminal world from the East
to the West. The backbone of this organization is - illegal drugs.
The Triads are virtually unknown to
the underworld business until the mid 50s. By then, Auguste Joseph Ricord, a
Corsican boss of the French connection, was the king of heroin trade from
Turkey to Marseilles and into New York until the mid-70s.
Heroin addiction, however, declined
at the entry of the Latin-American Cocaine Cowboys in the underworld business.
A research conducted by Posner revealed that at the time, Cocaine Cowboys
earned enormous profit from this booming trade where “shabu” earned its
street-name - poor man’s cocaine.
But not until the advent of the 80s
when the Hong Kong Triads took control of the heroin trade in the US with their
“China white” product coming from the Golden Triangle, the mountainous
mist-shrouded areas in Southeast Asia fit for the cultivation of hush-poppy
plants.
The Golden Triangle is consist of the
Northern provinces of Siam (now Thailand), Eastern fringe of Laos and a broad
stretch of Northeast Burma ( now Myanmar). The Chinese are also credited for conversion
of Hong Kong as the third-largest financial center after New York and London.
Hong Kong has become a melting pot of
world’s businesses and had the world’s most profitable bank – the Hong Kong and
Shanghai Bank. The 14K Triads is the most dominant gang in Hong Kong, a British
colony, before it was returned to Mainland China in July 1997. It has over
30,000 members in the colony alone.
A Hong Kong Police Superintendent said
the Chinese Triads invented organized crime. And as he is said to have
remarked, “They are the best at it. These secret societies have made it into
big business and they are absolutely ruthless.”
This syndicate makes billions of
dollars every year from regular businesses of organized crime – gambling,
prostitution, extortion, loan sharking, protection rackets, guns-for-hire, up
to political and civic corruption. But there is one thing that makes them
unique – heroin!
Triads control most of world’s heroin
supply coming from the Golden Triangle, a mountainous patch of land covering Laos,
Thailand and Burma that can produce more than 70 percent of the world’s opium
and heroin. This is an advantage the other criminal organizations don’t have.”
But where did these Chinese Triads
originate? How did Hong Kong become a British colony and how did the Triads
become warlord of crime in underworld business? How did they make the Mafia looked
like a bunch of school kids in uniform when it comes to atrocities in criminal
activities?
Next issue: Origin of The Triads.
Hole of Justice: The Rule of Law - on Laches
Hole of Justice: The Rule of Law - on Laches: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea RULE OF LAW – ON LACHES Laches is not concerned merely with lapse of time unlike prescription...
Hole of Justice: The Rule of Law - on Laches
Hole of Justice: The Rule of Law - on Laches: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea RULE OF LAW – ON LACHES Laches is not concerned merely with lapse of time unlike prescription...
Hole of Justice: The Rule of Law - on Laches
Hole of Justice: The Rule of Law - on Laches: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea RULE OF LAW – ON LACHES Laches is not concerned merely with lapse of time unlike prescription...
The Rule of Law - on Laches
Hole of Justice
By
Peter G. Jimenea
RULE OF LAW – ON LACHES
Laches is not concerned merely with lapse of time unlike prescription.
The latter deals with the facts of delay, laches deals with the effect of
unreasonable delay, or failure/neglect for an unreasonable, unexplained length
of time to do that by which, exercising due diligence could have been done
earlier. (267 SCRA 339).
The failed P137M Housing Project of the Iloilo City government in Pavia,
Iloilo, is a story that won’t go away. The construction of 413 units of
low-cost houses for City Hall employees that started in 2001 has ended in 2009
without even a unit completed. Let this be a case study.
A case was file against the responsible city officials but it seems not
good for the Office of the Ombudsman. It slept their as graft-investigators has
failed to find a probable cause against the accused who messed-up with the
taxpayers’ money. What a weak defense to save face!
Probable cause needs only to rest on evidence showing that most likely
than not a crime has been committed. It demands more than suspicion and
requires less than evidence to justify indictment. The unauthorized payment of
P43M by the mayor to the contractor is already embraced in RA 3019.
But the decision approved and signed by Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales
slams the Information accusing Mayor Jerry Trenas, Melchor Tan, Edwin Bravo,
Catherine Tingson and Alex Trinidad for Violation of Sec. 3, Par (e) of RA 3019
as amended and ruled…it is HEREBY SET ASIDE.” Set aside only, nothing follows?
SEC. 16, ART. Iii of the 1987 Constitution reads: “All person shall have
the right to a speedy disposition of their cases before all judicial or
administrative bodies. Also SEC. 16, ART. IV of the 1973 Constitution likewise
guarantees the right of all persons to a speedy disposition of their cases.
Finding probable cause is not the reason or justification of the Ombudsman
for delay. Different weights cannot be assigned to different reasons or
justifications invoked by the State, such as failure of the accused to follow
up their pending cases with the office of the Ombudsman.
As respondent, it is not the duty of the accused to follow up the
prosecution of the case. Conversely, it was the responsibility of the Office of
the Ombudsman to expedite the same with reasonable timeliness in view of its
mandate to promptly act on all complaints lodged before it.
A defendant has no duty to bring himself to trial; the State has that
duty, as well as the duty of insuring that the trial is consistent with due
process. A deliberate attempt to delay the trial in order to hamper or
prejudice the defense should be weighted heavily against the State!
Jurisprudence dictates, “”A delay in the disposition of cases amounts to
a denial of justice, brings the Court to disrepute and ultimately erodes public
faith and confidence in the judiciary. (280 SCRA 637)
The SC finds the inordinate delay of more than six (6) years by the
Ombudsman in resolving the criminal complaints against the petitioner to be
violative of his Constitutionally guaranteed right to due process and to a
speedy disposition of cases against him. (Anchangco vs. Ombudsman, 268 SCRA
301)
Lex reprobate moram – the law disapproves of delay. Thus, for the unjust delay of the
Ombudsman, the Sandiganbayan approved to dismiss the graft case filed against
Petitioner Rafael Coscolluela. The Ombudsman has failed in probing his case for
5 years. (G.R. No. 191411, July 15, 2013).
Delay is a two-edge sword. It is the government that must bear the burden
of proving its case beyond reasonable doubt. What if the witnesses in the case
have gone away without informing the litigants of the decision? Time passed makes
it impossible for the government to carry its burden.
The Constitution and the Rules do not require impossibilities or
extraordinary efforts, diligence or exertion from the courts or prosecutors,
nor contemplate that such right shall deprive the State of the reasonable
opportunity to fairly prosecute criminals.
As vanguard against corruption and bureaucracy, the Office of the
Ombudsman must have a system of officials’ accountability to ensure that cases
before it are resolved with reasonable dispatch to equally expose those who are
responsible for its delays, as it ought to determine in this case.
Never had here been officials so derelict and irresolute in the
performance of duty than the Ombudsman and Deputies. The case against (Mayor)
now Cong. Jerry Trenas el al is already over 10 years and should have been dismissed
by now. But why set aside only? Why not dismiss the case? Is the Office of the
Ombudsman another syndicate we have to deal with? Just asking.
Hole of Justice: The Supreme Court Says
Hole of Justice: The Supreme Court Says: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea The Supreme Court on Delay “Injustice lies fairly in delayed decision than an erroneous one w...
The Supreme Court Says
Hole of Justice
By
Peter G. Jimenea
The Supreme Court on Delay
“Injustice lies fairly in delayed decision
than an erroneous one which can be appealed immediately. Delay causes prolonged
anxiety to party litigants and could tie their assets and other properties in
litigation.”
This explains why the Bill of Rights contains as it is in Art. III of the
Constitution occupies a position of primacy to the fundamental law way above
the articles on government powers. This includes the right of the accused for a
speedy trial of his case. Jurisprudence dictates, lex reprobate moram – the law disapproves of delay.
The Court values liberty and will insist on the observance of basic
Constitutional rights as a condition sine qua non against the extremely abusive
investigative and prosecutor powers of the government. Summum jus, summum injuria – extreme enforcement of law may lead to
injustice. (Berico vs CA, 225 SCRA 562).
Let’s take the case of Rafael Coscolluela, governor of Negros Occidental
for three full terms from July 1992 to June 30, 2001. During his tenure of
office, Edwin Nacionales served as his Special Projects Head, Jose Ma. Amugod as assistant
and Ernesto Malvas as Provincial Health Officer.
On November 9, 2001, the Office of the Ombudsman Visayas received a
letter-complaint dated November 7, 2001 from the People’s Graftwatch,
requesting to investigate the anomalous purchase of medical and agricultural
equipment for P20,000,000.00 which allegedly happened a month before
Coscolluela stepped down from office.
Acting on the letter-complaint, the Case Building Team of the Ombudsman
conducted its investigation. A Final Evaluation Report dated April 16, 2002,
upgrading the complaint into a criminal case was filed. The respondents also filed
their respective counter-affidavits.
On March 27, 2003, Graft- Investigation Officer Butch E. Cañares prepared
a Resolution (March 27, 2003 Resolution), finding probable cause against the respondents
for violation of Section 3(e) of RA 3019 “Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act”
and recommended the filing of corresponding information.
He submits the same to Deputy Ombudsman for the Visayas Primo C. Miro for
recommendation. Miro recommended approval of the Information on June 5, 2003. Acting Ombudsman Orlando Casimiro approved it on
May 21, 2009 and filed it at the Sandiganbayan on June 19, 2009. (Take note of
the time lapsed)
On July 9, 2009, a Motion To Quash was filed with the Sandiganbayan
Second Division by Coscolluela arguing, among others, that his constitutional
right to a speedy trial was violated. He learned of the Resolution and
Information only on March 27, 2003, when they get a copy after its filing with
the Sandiganbayan.
He cited that the criminal charges against him were resolved only after
eight (8) years since the complaint was instituted,when the speedy disposition
of his case is guaranteed under the Philippine Constitution. His co-respondents Nacionales, Malvas, and Amugod later adopted his
motion.
An opposition to Motion to Quash filed by the Ombudsman on August 7, 2009,
cited the Information originally dated March 27, 2003, has still to go through
careful reviews and revisions before its final approval. And respondents never
raised any objections regarding the purported delay in the proceedings during
the interim.
The SANDIGANBAYAN SECOND DIVISION, however, recognizes the prejudice
caused to petitioners by the lengthy delay in the proceedings against them. It
said that it was the Ombudsman’s responsibility to expedite the same within the
bounds of reasonable timeliness in view of its mandate to promptly act on all
complaints lodged before it.
In the case of Barker vs. Wingo, the Court said that a defendant has no
duty to bring himself to trial; the State has that duty as well as the duty of
insuring that the trial is consistent with due process. So, it ordered the
Sandiganbayan First Division to DISMISS the case against all the respondents.
(G.R. No. 191411).
One Final Note: The SC finds the inordinate delay of more than six (6)
years by the Ombudsman in resolving the criminal complaints against Petitioner to
be violative of his Constitutionally guaranteed right to due process and a speedy
disposition of the case against him. (Anchangco v. Ombudsman, 268 SCRA 301)
Monday, June 22, 2015
Hole of Justice: The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - Last Part
Hole of Justice: The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - Last Part: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea The Kuratong Baleleng Gang (Last Part - The Expendables) In previous issue of TDG, a gun...
Hole of Justice: The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - Last Part
Hole of Justice: The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - Last Part: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea The Kuratong Baleleng Gang (Last Part - The Expendables) In previous issue of TDG, a gun...
Hole of Justice: The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - First of Two Parts
Hole of Justice: The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - First of Two Parts: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea The Kuratong Baleleng Gang (The Untouchables – first of two parts) On December 1995 ...
Hole of Justice: The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - First of Two Parts
Hole of Justice: The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - First of Two Parts: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea The Kuratong Baleleng Gang (The Untouchables – first of two parts) On December 1995 ...
Hole of Justice: The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - First of Two Parts
Hole of Justice: The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - First of Two Parts: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea The Kuratong Baleleng Gang (The Untouchables – first of two parts) On December 1995 ...
The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - Last Part
Hole of Justice
By Peter G. Jimenea
The Kuratong Baleleng Gang
(Last Part - The Expendables)
In previous issue of TDG, a gun-battle between the
carnap-gang and the HPG, ANCAR, SOU/TF Limbas took place on July 2, 1996. Five
(5) Kuratong members were arrested. During the tactical interrogation, one of
the five suspects, Allen Pellazar was identified as “Dominador Amparo,” an army
enlisted personnel.
Amparo, a member of the Kuratong Baleleng Gang jumped
bail in a Robbery with Murder case in 1991 in Cebu City. During arrest he
attempted to grab the service firearm of one SPO3 Armando Ballon but the latter
parry his hand and shoot him twice on the chest. Still, he was able to escape
from the police.
At the investigation room SPO3 Ballon arrived and
after the suspect was made to undress, the investigators discovered that he
bore two gunshot wounds on the chest confirming his identity not as Allen
Pellazar but Dominador Amparo. After a few minutes, he cooperated to reveal the
following;
He’s a member of the “Kuratong Baleleng-SOLIDO Gang
from Ozamis City. They are waiting only for the contact of their leader Joel
Arnan a.k.a. “Jojo” before they assemble at their rendezvous at Sucat Road near
NAIA. They are provided by the formerly arrested Army Captain and a certain “Nonoy,”
of G3, PA, Fort Bonifacio, with M-16, M-14, 45 Cal. Pistols and M203 Grenade
launchers.
After the heist they again converge in a designated
area where the weapons are collected and brought back to the PA headquarters.
He claimed that four (4) to six (6) carjacked vehicles were often used during
their operations and the loots are distributed only after the “BIG BOSSES” determine
their shares.
Fortunately, an aunt of Jojo’s wife, volunteered to
provide The SOU/TF Limbas “extensive knowledge” about the group, that Joel
Arnan a.k.a. “Jojo” was an enlisted ex-Army Scout Ranger personnel who is also
an escapee. As “Agent Joy” further narrate, a powerful politician and a number
of retired and active Military and Police Generals are “brains” behind the
group.
The ultimate motive of the KB-SOLIDO Gang was to raise
“campaign fund” for the 1998 elections. They are well organized for having
members in other government agencies such as the PNP, AFP, LTO and DILG. Agent
Joy told the SOU/TF Limbas that December 15 is the birthday of “Jojo,” the
KB-SOLIDO Gang leader and she will be attending the party.
From that occasion Joy was able to concretize the
information of the SOU/TF Limbas. At about 4:00 pm of October 31, 1996, a
30-minute bloody gun-battle ensued between the police and the gang at the
façade of Lexus Disco Club. Four TMG personnel were wounded, two police patrol
cars were totally wrecked by the M203 grenade launchers but two gang members
were also killed.
A dragnet was then set for the arrest of “Jojo,” leader
of the KB-SOLIDO gang. On February 1, 1997 at about 2:30 pm, SOU/TF Limbas
raided the gang’s hideout at the Greatland Subdivision, San Pedro, Laguna. Two
gang members were caught by surprised. Recovered were cache of ammos,
high-powered firearms, carjacked vehicles, MV plates and a motorcycle. “Jojo”
was not in the house.
On February 2, 1997, all possible exits from “Jojo’s
hideout were blocked after it was learned that he was inside limping due to
motorcycle accident. Later, a man on a motorcycle was seen leaving the house,
when arrested he turned out to be the advance party of the gang leader. But
“Jojo” is still inside the house.
At about 1:00 pm, a man was seen speeding away from
the house. A brief chase ensued and Joel Arnan aka “Jojo” was arrested. A
search warrant was then issued that led to the recovery of the following; M-14
rifles, Baby Armalite rifles with AFP markings, automatic Carbines, 45 and 380
pistols, Beretta Sub-machinegun, Micro UZI, boxes of ammos, car plates,
diplomat plate no. 19518 and assorted jewelries taken from the famous MILADY
heist.
Surprisingly, “Jojo” did not stay long in San Pedro,
Laguna Municipal Jail. A noise barrage was created by the inmates to facilitate
his escape. But by the time, he and his Army Captain cohort were already
considered expendable. “Jojo” was reported killed by police intelligence operatives
along NAIA Road in Pasay, Metro Manila. Expendable indeed!
The trump up case against PCI Rernato G. Laurinaria,
Commander of the SOU/TF Limbas was eventually dismissed by the Court. Agent
Joy, unable to be included in the witness protection of the government dropped
out of sight for fear of her life. The “Army Captain,” met his untimely death
by poisoning so as not to divulge the BIG BOSSES of the syndicate. Expendable
too!
The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - First of Two Parts
Hole of Justice
By Peter G. JimeneaThe Kuratong Baleleng Gang
(The Untouchables – first of two parts)
On December 1995 a highly syndicated violent
carnap-kidnap-bank robbery-group, the Kuratong Baleleng Gang - Solido Group, emerged
to sow terror in Metro Manila. Its heavily armed members forcibly take the vehicles
from their lawful owners for use to other crimes.
The gang figured prominently in series of bank robbery,
armoured van robberies, pawn shop and jewelry shop robberies, famous of which
was the Milady jewelry shop robbery. Noted was the gang’s ferocity to gun down
security guards and bank personnel without hesitation.
Then Police Chief Inspector Renato G. Laurinaria,
Commander of the Highway Patrol Group (HPG) SOU/TF Limbas, formed a team of ANCAR
Operatives to track down this gang. An “Order of Battle” (OB) was likewise
undertaken to assist local police where carjacking and armed robberies are
frequent.
On February 2, 1996, a brief running gun-battle ensued
at Banawe St., Quezon City between TF Limbas operatives and members of the
carjack-group. But traffic congestion hampered the pursuing police enabling the
suspects to escape leaving behind their getaway carjacked-vehicle.
The recovery of the wanted motor vehicle gave the HPG/TF
Limbas operatives a glimpse of the personal belongings left behind by the
notorious group like pay-parking tickets, gas receipts, expressway entrance and
exit tickets and receipts for unnecessary expenses.
But the ambush-slaying of two anti-carjacking TMG-NCR
operatives at Rodriguez St., Quezon City on February 5, 1996, caused an
animosity between PCI Laurinaria and then TMG Director P/Supt. Romeo Maganto. Laurinaria
was relieved. But on June 8, 1996, the new TMG Director reinstalled him.
It paved the way for the discovery of unusual operation of the Kuratong Baleleng-Solido Gang. Three (3) gasoline receipts stood out most as they pointed that the notorious group had been frequenting a gasoline station located right inside Fort Bonifacio.
This enabled PCI Laurinaria to conclude that members
of this group could either be active and dismissed military and/or police
personnel. The TF Limbas ANCAR operatives were soon directed to focus their
monitoring efforts inside the Fort Bonifacio.
At an unholy hour of the morning of June 24, 1996, a
Mitsubishi Lancer GXLi with plate number TKA-706 reported as carjacked was
spotted inside the parking area of the General Headquarters of Philippine Army
in Fort Bonifacio, Makati City.
On the very same day at about 6:00 pm, an Army Captain
was about to drive off the wanted vehicle when arrested. His arrest bolstered
the suspicion that the AFP and the PNP have connection with this Kuratong
Baleleng Gang and thus known as the “Solido Group.”
Before the SOU/TF Limbas investigators could extract
vital information from the arrested army captain, his “mistah’s” at the TMG
(now HPG) intervened and took custody of him. This denied ANCAR operatives their
much needed information as to the existence of this notorious group.
On July 2, 1996, along Bangkal St., Makati City, at
around 11:30 am, another brief gun-battle ensued between TF Limbas and the
Kuratong Gang members. It ended with the capture of five gang members and recovery
of two carjacked vehicles. A sketch map of the ASIAN bank in Buendia Ave. was
also found.
At 4:00 pm of October 31, 1996, a bloody shoot-out
between the group and the police took place at Timog Ave., Quezon City
resulting to the total damage of two police vehicles by M203 grenade launchers
fired by the gang. Four (4) TMGs have been wounded but two Kuratong members
were killed and one captured.
Pressed as to who the ”BIG BOSSES” were, the five arrested Kuratong Baleleng Gang
members pointed to a Joel Arnan alyas ‘Jojo’ and the previously arrested Army
Captain as the persons who could best identify the “BIG BOSSES” of the
syndicate.
But the taking up of captured members alive, proved
too costly for Laurinaria. As they were about to jump-off for the arrest of
gang leader “Joel Arnan,” a “trump-up” case that has long been fabricated
against him was immediately laid down for his arrest. Worse, the arresting team
was led by P/General Romeo Maganto now assigned at the DILG.
Surprisingly, when PCI Laurinaria was relieved, the
captured Kuratong member was remitted to
another jail and was reported later to have escaped. The records of the
arrested Army Captain also disappeared from the file and can no longer be
found.
Hole of Justice: The SC on Delay
Hole of Justice: The SC on Delay: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea The Supreme Court on Delay “Injustice lies fairly in delayed decision than an erroneo...
Hole of Justice: The SC on Delay
Hole of Justice: The SC on Delay: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea The Supreme Court on Delay “Injustice lies fairly in delayed decision than an erroneo...
Hole of Justice: The SC on Delay
Hole of Justice: The SC on Delay: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea The Supreme Court on Delay “Injustice lies fairly in delayed decision than an erroneo...
Hole of Justice: The SC on Delay
Hole of Justice: The SC on Delay: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea The Supreme Court on Delay “Injustice lies fairly in delayed decision than an erroneo...
Hole of Justice: The SC on Delay
Hole of Justice: The SC on Delay: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea The Supreme Court on Delay “Injustice lies fairly in delayed decision than an erroneo...
The SC on Delay
Hole of Justice
By
Peter G. Jimenea
The Supreme Court on Delay
“Injustice lies fairly in delayed decision than an erroneous one which can be appealed immediately. Delay causes prolonged anxiety to party litigants and could tie their assets and other properties in litigation.”
This explains why the Bill of Rights contains as it is in Art. III of the
Constitution occupies a position of primacy to the fundamental law way above
the articles on government powers. This includes the right of the accused for a
speedy trial of his case. Jurisprudence dictates, lex reprobate moram – the law disapproves of delay.
The Court values liberty and will insist on the observance of basic
Constitutional rights as a condition sine qua non against the extremely abusive
investigative and prosecutor powers of the government. Summum jus, summum injuria – extreme enforcement of law may lead to
injustice. (Berico vs CA, 225 SCRA 562).
Let’s take the case of Rafael Coscolluela, governor of Negros Occidental
for three full terms from July 1992 to June 30, 2001. During his tenure of
office, Edwin Nacionales served as his Special Projects Head, Jose Ma. Amugod as assistant
and Ernesto Malvas as Provincial Health Officer.
On November 9, 2001, the Office of the Ombudsman Visayas received a
letter-complaint dated November 7, 2001 from the People’s Graftwatch,
requesting to investigate the anomalous purchase of medical and agricultural
equipment for P20,000,000.00 which allegedly happened a month before
Coscolluela stepped down from office.
Acting on the letter-complaint, the Case Building Team of the Ombudsman
conducted its investigation. A Final Evaluation Report dated April 16, 2002,
upgrading the complaint into a criminal case was filed. The respondents also filed
their respective counter-affidavits.
On March 27, 2003, Graft- Investigation Officer Butch E. Cañares prepared
a Resolution (March 27, 2003 Resolution), finding probable cause against the respondents
for violation of Section 3(e) of RA 3019 “Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act”
and recommended the filing of corresponding information.
He submits the same to Deputy Ombudsman for the Visayas Primo C. Miro for
recommendation. Miro recommended approval of the Information on June 5, 2003. Acting Ombudsman Orlando Casimiro approved it on
May 21, 2009 and filed it at the Sandiganbayan on June 19, 2009. (Take note of
the time lapsed)
On July 9, 2009, a Motion To Quash was filed with the Sandiganbayan
Second Division by Coscolluela arguing, among others, that his constitutional
right to a speedy trial was violated. He learned of the Resolution and
Information only on March 27, 2003, when they get a copy after its filing with
the Sandiganbayan.
He cited that the criminal charges against him were resolved only after
eight (8) years since the complaint was instituted,when the speedy disposition
of his case is guaranteed under the Philippine Constitution. His co-respondents Nacionales, Malvas, and Amugod later adopted his
motion.
An opposition to Motion to Quash filed by the Ombudsman on August 7, 2009,
cited the Information originally dated March 27, 2003, has still to go through
careful reviews and revisions before its final approval. And respondents never
raised any objections regarding the purported delay in the proceedings during
the interim.
The SANDIGANBAYAN SECOND DIVISION, however, recognizes the prejudice
caused to petitioners by the lengthy delay in the proceedings against them. It
said that it was the Ombudsman’s responsibility to expedite the same within the
bounds of reasonable timeliness in view of its mandate to promptly act on all
complaints lodged before it.
In the case of Barker vs. Wingo, the Court said that a defendant has no
duty to bring himself to trial; the State has that duty as well as the duty of
insuring that the trial is consistent with due process. So, it ordered the
Sandiganbayan First Division to DISMISS the case against all the respondents.
(G.R. No. 191411).
One Final Note: The SC finds the inordinate delay of more than six (6)
years by the Ombudsman in resolving the criminal complaints against Petitioner to
be violative of his Constitutionally guaranteed right to due process and a speedy
disposition of the case against him. (Anchangco v. Ombudsman, 268 SCRA 301)
Wednesday, June 3, 2015
Hole of Justice: The Unwanted Child
Hole of Justice: The Unwanted Child: Hole of Justice by Peter G. Jimenea Unwanted Child and Abortion It is imperative for us to know on how life develops in the w...
The Unwanted Child
Hole
of Justice
by
Peter G. Jimenea
Unwanted
Child and Abortion
It is imperative for us to know on
how life develops in the woman’s womb though a wanted or unwanted child. The
issue on Reproductive Health Bill (RHB) has an unfinished debate between the proponents
and Church devotees, thus, this article.
A book on “Mongolism” in 1959 sparked
a non-stop debate between scientists and Church devotees in France. But in
August 1969, its author Dr. Jerome Lejeune, was awarded by the American Society
of Human Genetics the highest distinction ever granted to a geneticist.
Mongolism is also called “Down-Syndrome.”
It affects one in every 650 new born babies around the world. Dr. Lejeune told
thousands of families with affected child that their kids are created from the
image of God and badly need love and affection.
But the American medical society during
that time has already resorted to abort affected babies from being born. They
say it is inhuman to allow the poor child to come into this world. Britain
followed legalizing the screening for down-syndrome and its “treatment by
abortion.”
Thus, the media battle shifted to abortion
of “unwanted babies” in the two countries which share the same theory, that “a baby cannot legally become a person until
it is born and the woman has the right to do what she wants with her body.” This
is based on the pretext of scientific rigor, a point of view in which God has
no place.
The good they say, it obviates the future
child problem of the family as it also stops the birth of unwanted babies. The
bad is, it interferes with material progress that a mongoloid is not created
from the image of God, a child who could love Him to eternity.
Church leaders disagreed on the
premise that life is sacred and shared by devotees who believe that sperm has
already life in it. In essence, it is half-true because a television remains an
idle TV set unless driven by a power or energy to show the pictures on the
screen.They argue that veterinarians can send dozen of cattle from Palawan to Mindanao using an envelope as carrier. True, but in that envelope are the bull’s sperm prepared for “artificial insemination,” to give birth to a dozen calves. This disproved the theory that the bull’s sperm alone has life in it.
That sperm will remain a sperm until
it is injected into a cow’s womb for the development of an “embryo.” The embryo is a living thing in
early stage formed by the inter-action of the male’s sperm inside the womb of
the opposite sex by harmonious relationship or by-forced sexual intercourse.
Contraceptives and condom prevent an
embryo’s development. This is not abortion as what the oppositions’ earlier
claim hinted at. It only disallows the man’s egg to penetrate into the woman’s
womb and form into an embryo. There is no killing or murder here!The increasing population is not the main problem of the government. The very clear factor is the widening economic disparity between the rich and the poor caused by unequal distribution of wealth controlled by the few rich clans in this country.
Every time the poor ask from the
government the basic services they rightfully deserved, they always end up
badly-disillusioned. The sick and dying infants of poor mothers in government
hospitals are counting. Why? There is lack of medicine and affordable health
care for the poor people!.
If the sickly children of poor
families survived, what promise of tomorrow awaits them? Unemployment is
getting worse. Corruption is another. The K to 12 designed of DepEd (added 2 years) for
elementary to high school education is an added burden to poor families.With the perceived number of out-of-school youth, I fear we are only producing more criminals than responsible citizens with this DepEd design. Look, the proliferation of illegal drugs is unstoppable. Why? A hungry stomach knows no law. This is now a national crisis and we are getting closer to Mexico!
Let us open our citizens’ awareness in having too many kids they cannot provide good health and proper education. It’s not yet too late. I stood pat defending the RH Bill because I know the prize of this effort is what we have been searching for – the TRUTH that will set us free!
Monday, June 1, 2015
Hole of Justice: Business Behind Bars
Hole of Justice: Business Behind Bars: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea Business Behind Bars “In underworld business, there are betrayals, swindling, double cro...
Hole of Justice: Business Behind Bars
Hole of Justice: Business Behind Bars: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea Business Behind Bars “In underworld business, there are betrayals, swindling, double cro...
Business Behind Bars
Hole
of Justice
By
Peter G. Jimenea
Business
Behind Bars
On
April 29, 2015, an inmate (name withheld to protect the family) at the Bureau
of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP) in Ungka District Jail at Jaro, Iloilo
City, was reported to have committed suicide inside his cell.
Three
days later, May 3, 2015, another inmate in the same compound was also reported
to have committed suicide. But the autopsy report of the medico legal revealed
otherwise, the two prisoners are victims of foul play. Other than traces of
torture, one has a punctured wound on the head.
The
two victims are facing drug charges and one is on schedule for hearing the next
day. There were signs of torture in their bodies and worse, they were found
positive of drugs during autopsy. Parents of the victims are asking justice but
to date no inmate cooperates.
We
cannot discount the possibility that the two victims have unpaid debts while
still outside to the supplier of their vices. People hooked-on-drugs will
always find ways to provide their addicted bodies with drugs and other
substance to satisfy the need.
This
reminds me of the arrest of Mexican drug lord Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman of the dreaded
Sinaloa Cartel on February 2015, in Northern Mexico. The powerful Mexican drug
lord faces multiple indictments in the US Court. But until now Pres. Barack Obama
has not yet requested his extradition.
The
Sinaloa Cartel displaced the Carrillo Fuentes criminal organization in Ciudad
Juárez. The court papers identify Gabino Salas Valenciano as El Chapo’s man who
ran the cartel’s business in Ciudad Juárez. His job was to hire arms dealers,
drug traffickers and assassins in the U.S. to eliminate clients who will not
pay their debts.
On
August 5, 2009, at Sierra Blanca, Texas inspection station, agents stopped two persons
with trailer containing 303.9 kilos of marijuana. It was learned that a 30
year-old Sergio Saucedo owned them and was trying to smuggle from Mexico.
A month later, on September 3, a
group of masked gunmen from the U.S.–broke into a house in Horizon City, in the
suburbs of El Paso, and kidnapped Saucedo in a maroon-colored Ford Expedition.
It is widely believed that El Chapo ordered the kidnapping.
Five days later after his kidnapping,
on September 8, 2009, Saucedo’s body was found on the banks of the Rio Grande
river semi-nude, with signs of torture and with cut-off hands placed over his
chest, a sign of not-paying-debts.
A suspect in the kidnapping case when
arrested eventually revealed that Saucedo had stolen more than 600 pounds of
marijuana from the drug lord. It was Salas Valenciano, El Chapo’s man in Ciudad
Juárez, who paid them $250,000 to deliver Saucedo.
El Chapo like other kingpins in the
underworld business has a nice way to deliver his message. Through his man
Salas Valenciano who ran the cartel business in Ciudad Juárez, they made their
rule known to the underworld – “TILL DEBT DO US PART.”
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)