Pages

Tuesday, October 27, 2015

Hole of Justice: The Dismissed 19 PNP Officers

Hole of Justice: The Dismissed 19 PNP Officers: Hole of Justice by Peter G. Jimenea The Dismissed 19 PNP Officers On June 02, 2015, the Ombudsman dismissed nineteen (19) top PNP...

The Dismissed 19 PNP Officers

Hole of Justice
by Peter G. Jimenea

The Dismissed 19 PNP Officers

On June 02, 2015, the Ombudsman dismissed nineteen (19) top PNP officials from service due to the P5M rubber-boat scam. Among them are S/Supt. Cornelio Salinas, Director of the Iloilo Provincial Police Office (IPPO) and also former IPPO Dir. C/Supt. Reynaldo Rafal.
THE CASE. In 2009, the PNP National HQ issued a resolution for the procurement of watercrafts for the Maritime Goup. A budget of P5M was approved for 20 units. By that time S/Supt. Salinas was then with Maritime Command (MARICOM).
As I cannot contact Salinas, I called C/Supt. Rafal who had been a Director of Logistics Support Services (LSS) on March 31, 2010. He claimed the delivery of the boats was on March 22, 2010, at least a week before he assumed his Directorial post.
As the LSS Director, he said to have signed the Disbursement Voucher because all certifications were properly attached to it, the inspection, acceptance, availability of funds, accounting office certification, etc. But it is not his duty to personally check the boat in Navotas Pier.
To check the delivery, the bidding process and selection of supplier is the duty of the Maritime Group, a separate unit as mandated by the NHQ, PNP Maritime Group. Contrary to report, those are not rubber-boats but boats made of fiberglass reinforced by lumber and marine plywood with bamboo outriggers (katig).
He said the Maritime Group created the BAC, conducted the bidding and select the supplier. There was no indication of possible problem at that time since the deal was worth P4.5M while the approved ABC (budget of the contract) is P5M. So although the boats were reduced in number from 20 to 16, the government has saved P.5M.
When the rubber-boats were delivered and inspected on March 22, 2010, according to the Ombudsman, they found the following defects; 1). No oil pressure and water temperature gauges, a speedometer and other essential parts of a rubber boat uninstalled. Hence, a case was filed against all people involved in the deal.
Like Rafal, S/Supt. Salinas is a dedicated police officer in service. But the Ombudsman knew nothing about them. She has only that large propensity to act based on raw intelligence data to prosecute than to praise government employees.
According to C/Supt. Rafal, he was never interviewed personally by any graft investigator on this case. He was only required to file his counter affidavit and yet, he was also dismissed like the other top PNP officers without proper investigation of his involvement.
The Ombudsman has failed to promote efficient service as provided for in Sec. 13 of RA 6770 or the Ombudsman Act of 1989. It failed to use properly its investigatory and prosecutor powers to inquire and obtain information sufficient to support a resolution.
Why run after the police officers for the P4.5M anomaly and ordered only to set aside the P137M Iloilo City Housing Scam of Liberal Party stooges in the city? Are cases against administration crooks not good for the Court?
Look at the length of time spent by the Office of the Ombudsman to investigate this P4.5M alleged rubber-boat anomaly. Baloney! Five years has caused prolonged anxiety to litigant-police officers whose future and that of the family were forcibly tied to litigation.
Summum jus, summum injuria – extreme enforcement of law may lead to injustice. Good that the Court values liberty and will always insist on the observance of basic Constitutional rights as a condition sine qua non against the extremely abusive investigative and prosecutor powers of the government. (Berico vs CA, 225 SCRA 562).
In G.R. 191411, Coscolluela vs. Ombudsman, the Court reprimanded the Ombudsman for deliberate delay in resolving cases. It is their responsibility to expedite the case within the bounds of reasonable time in view of its mandate to promptly act on all complaints lodged before it.
As pronounced in the case of Barker v. Wingo: A defendant has no  duty to bring himself to trial; the State has that duty as well as the duty of insuring that the trial is consistent with due process. And a conduct of proper investigation is one. Due to delay, the cases against Coscolluela et al. were eventually dismissed.
Ombudsman’s reliance on raw intelligence data is bad. It is only for lazy graft-investigators and government crooks that what she did is good. See the injustice to police officer for that P4.5M mess? What about the DAP and PDAF of crooks in billions when the SC says these are unconstitutional?

Why is she so silent about it? Let us presumed she is not bias but who are the indicted administration allies? Just don’t make the family of the dismissed police officers hungry or someday they will run amuck. Remember, a hungry stomach knows no law!

Sunday, October 25, 2015

Hole of Justice: Ombudsman Raw Intel Data

Hole of Justice: Ombudsman Raw Intel Data: Hole of Justice by Peter G. Jimenea The Ombudsman Raw Intel Data In 2009, the PNP National HQ issued a resolution for the procure...

Hole of Justice: Ombudsman Raw Intel Data

Hole of Justice: Ombudsman Raw Intel Data: Hole of Justice by Peter G. Jimenea The Ombudsman Raw Intel Data In 2009, the PNP National HQ issued a resolution for the procure...

Ombudsman Raw Intel Data

Hole of Justice
by Peter G. Jimenea

The Ombudsman Raw Intel Data

In 2009, the PNP National HQ issued a resolution for the procurement of watercrafts for the Maritime Goup. A budget of P5M was approved for 20 units and a bidding was held but failed, hence, the procurement by administration.
On 2010, instead of 20 units at pegged price of 250,000 each, the PNP paid to the supplier Four Petals Trading a P4.5 million for the 16 units of watercrafts costing 312,000 each. The reduction of four units gave the MARICOM a savings of P.5M as reported.
When the rubber-boats were delivered and inspected on March 22, 2010, the Ombudsman found out the following defects; 1). No oil pressure and water temperature gauges, a speedometer and other parts essential to a rubber boat. A case was filed against all people involved in the deal.
On June 02, 2015 a consolidated decision was promulgated dismissing nineteen (19) top PNP officials from service due to involvement in the P5M rubber-boat transaction. One is S/Supt. Cornelio Salinas, Director of the Iloilo Provincial Police Office (IPPO).
S/Supt. Salinas is widely believed a dedicated police officer in service and a good leader by example for subordinates who are lucky to wear the police uniform they are so proud of. But the Ombudsman seemed to have overlooked the real details of the investigation report.
The P4.5M watercrafts are not rubber-boats as described in the news report. They are made of fiberglass, reinforced by lumber and marine plywood with outriggers (katig) made of bamboo. And the mentioned other lacking parts are not that essential to install.
Beside which, some of the police officers linked by the Ombudsman were not personally interviewed by graft-investigators as to veracity of the anomaly reported. They were only required to file counter-affidavits, nothing more.
The Ombudsman has failed to promote efficient service to the people as provided for in Sec. 13 of RA 6770 or the Ombudsman Act of 1989. It failed to use its investigatory and prosecutor powers to inquire and obtain information to institute and implement measures.
Why run after the police officers forP4.5M anomaly and skipped the P137M Iloilo Housing Scam of the administration stooges in the city? Are cases against administration crooks not good for theOmbudsman Court?
While the Ombudsman has the full discretion to determine whether or not a criminal case should be filed, the Supreme Court (SC) is not precluded from reviewing the Ombudsman action when there is an abuse of discretion. (Garcia-Rueda vs. Pascasio, 278 SCRA 769).
Just look at the length of time spent by the Office of the Ombudsman to investigate this P4.5M alleged rubber-boat anomaly. The five years has caused prolonged anxiety to the litigant-police officers and have tied their assets and other properties to litigation.
But the Court values liberty and will always insist on the observance of basic Constitutional rights as a condition sine qua non against the extremely abusive investigative and prosecutor powers of the government. Summum jus, summum injuria – extreme enforcement of law may lead to injustice. (Berico vs CA, 225 SCRA 562).
In G.R. 191411, Coscolluela vs. Ombudsman, the SANDIGANBAYAN SECOND DIVISION reprimanded the Ombudsman that it is their responsibility to expedite the case within the bounds of reasonable timeliness in view of its mandate to promptly act on all complaints lodged before it.
As pronounced in the case of Barker v. Wingo: A defendant has no  duty to bring himself to trial; the State has that duty as well as the duty of insuring that the trial is consistent with due process. Due to delay it ordered to dismiss the case against Coscolluela et al.

Omb Conchita Carpio Morales should not rely on raw intelligence data of her people. It is only for her lazy investigators and the real crooks that what she did is good. The law says; “it is safer to err in acquitting than in punishing.” Now can she feel the agony of this injustice to the rightful police officer?

Thursday, July 16, 2015

Hole of Justice: Hong Kong a British Colony

Hole of Justice: Hong Kong a British Colony: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea How Hong Kong Became a British Colony (3 rd of a Series) During the 1800s, European powers f...

Hong Kong a British Colony

Hole of Justice
By Peter G. Jimenea

How Hong Kong Became a British Colony (3rd of a Series)

During the 1800s, European powers funded their colonial ambitions through narcotics. Britain led the drive. The British are the most organized drug traffickers in history. They Import opium from India and targeted China’s millions of people as principal market.

Prior to the British campaign, China has a small number of opium smokers, leftovers of the Dutch efforts. The British became the first Western government to traffic in narcotics due to big profits as shown in their 20% of the India’s opium revenues.

Despite the Emperor’s objection, Indian opium shipments increased, so did the number of addicts. The Chinese banned opium but British captains of the Soldier-Merchant-Executives of London ignored the ban. They sailed into different Chinese ports to unload the stuff.

From 200 tons in 1800s, the opium shipments increased to 2,000 tons in 1840. The Chinese resented the British colonial aspirations. Though the Ch’ing Dynasty was politically weak they seized and destroyed $6 million of opium and arrested some British traders.

Those arrested were exiled in the freezing Central Asia and one was even crucified and shown publicly at Canton docks as a warning to British traders. The British exploded when Cantonese officials dumped thousands of kilos of opium into the sea during the Far Eastern Boston Tea Party.

The British responded by shelling the coastline and a full-scale wars between Britain and China erupted in 1839 to 1856. But Chinese junks and rusted canons have no match against the powerful fleets of the enemies. The dubbed “Opium Wars” resulted to a full British victory.

China became powerless to stop the opium trade and worse, it was also obliged to pay the British a costly war-reparation. Unable to pay the cost, they ceded Hong Kong to British control. This is how Kong Kong became a British colony. Soon addiction spread from China to Southeast Asia, Europe and the United States.

Britain made opium the world’s largest cash commodity. When the demand overtook supply, the Chinese government, which by then badly need of funds, finally tolerates domestic opium cultivation in two provinces. By 1900, it turned a blind eye to a yearly production of 20,000 tons.

During the late 1800s, a new breed of colonizers from Europe divided Asia into colonies, protectorates and spheres of influence. Laos and Cambodia became French-Indochina. Burma and Thailand became a British boundary separating it from the French territory.

The 1911 people revolution led by Mao Tse-tung ended the imperial government and a new republic was formed. But it only worsened the problem. Without a strong Central government to provide, powerful military warlords controlled the cultivation and exports of opium.

But not until a New People’s Republic of China was formed that put everything in place. Hong Kong residents feel living on a borrowed time. The perceived the fantasies of Lifestyle of the Rich and Famous will soon be over. Only few have the faintest idea of this upcoming event.

The Joint Declaration signed between the People’s Republic of China and Great Britain states that Hong Kong shall be returned to China by 1997.  On July 1997, Hong Kong was returned to Mainland China as agreed and its residents became restive.

Mostly affected are drug lords and drug syndicates thriving in Hong Kong. They knew the Mainland Chinese have a simple solution to drug problem – a bullet in the head done in public. Thus, drug lords were forced to migrate to the East and the West to play safe.

Others picked the Philippines as country of choice after knowing the corruptibility of our public officials. They knew drug money can buy judges, prosecutors, police and military officers, government workers politicians and even barangay leaders. The problem is they also bring their wares with them!


Next issue: Illegal Drugs as backbone of the Triads

Hole of Justice: The Chinese Triads (Part 2 of a Series)

Hole of Justice: The Chinese Triads (Part 2 of a Series): Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea History of the Triads (Part 2 of a series} The Chinese Triad is a secret society with over 40...

The Chinese Triads (Part 2 of a Series)

Hole of Justice
By Peter G. Jimenea

History of the Triads (Part 2 of a series}

The Chinese Triad is a secret society with over 400 years of history behind it. Triad has a noble purpose when organized. They resented the occupation of the Northern part of China by the invading barbarian Manchus of Mongolia.

Triad societies are represented by an equilateral triangle signifying three basic concepts of Heaven, Earth and Man. They were founded as patriotic secret organization to overthrow the foreign conquerors and restore the Ming dynasty to the imperial throne.

About 1,500 years before Christ, these societies were founded in 17th century thirty years after the Manchus, (barbarian tribesmen from Mongolia) invaded China, swept over “the Great Wall” and placed the Northern part of the country in their domination.

The Manchus has an iron grip in two/thirds of Northern China but continued to face rebellion in the South. The rallying point for the anti-Manchus sentiment in the South is the Foochow monastery of the 128 militant monks who organized the local population into pocket of resistance.

By 1674, the Manchus consolidated their hold on Northern China and send large contingents of armed troops to the south. But the monks who had developed the form of self-defense called kung fu, held the Manchus out for almost three weeks.

A traitor among the monks, however,  help the Manchus disguised as waterboys to enter the secret underground tunnels into the monastery. Only 18 of monks escaped the slaughter but they were hunted by the Manchus brutally killing 13 of them.

The five remaining monks were credited for the first Triad society to drive the Manchus away from their lands. The secret societies have the spread like fever across Southern China and continue to thrive with a slogan “Armies protect the Emperor, Triads protect the people.”

The Triads tried several aborted revolutions like “The Urban Uprising,” “Taiping Rebellion” and others until the many radical critics of the Manchus joined them. By mid-1800 the Triads existence were threatened that large segments of their members migrated to foreign lands.

Out there they learned to engage in illegal activities to survive. The Mainland Triads sent members abroad to organize and protect the various kinds of vices and crimes that thrived among their homeless members. By the late 1800s, the Triads’ big income was sent to China to help the revolution.

In 1911, the Manchus were overthrown and a Republic was established. Dr. Sun yat-sen formed the first government being a senior Triad member. He is assisted by Charlie Soong, financier and member of the powerful “Red Gang,” and Army General Chiang Kai-shek who lost to Mao Tse-tung in 1949.

As they spread control over China’s underworld as well as in foreign countries, Gen. Chiang gave the Triads unprecedented opportunity to gain recognition and powers in national politics. His ambition was to lead China as the military chief of the new Imperial dynasty.

A litmus test for his new leadership was Gen. Chiang’s attempt to eliminate the Communist-led labor unions in Shanghai, the largest city in Southern China. He ordered the closure of the newspapers considered critical to him and the arrest of left-wing leaders and spokespersons of labor unions.

The oppressive government of Gen. Chiang sparked the 1949 revolution led by Mao Tse-tung. Chiang fled to Formosa (now Taiwan) with his few army generals leaving behind the others like Gen. Li who opened the Golden Triangle story to the new world.


Next issue: How Hong Kong became a British Colony.

Hole of Justice: History of Illegal Drugs (First of a Series)

Hole of Justice: History of Illegal Drugs (First of a Series): Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea History of Illegal Drugs (First of a Series) It is imperative for our peaceful citizens to kn...

History of Illegal Drugs (First of a Series)

Hole of Justice
By Peter G. Jimenea

History of Illegal Drugs (First of a Series)

It is imperative for our peaceful citizens to know the menace brought about by illegal drugs to society.  I started writing about illegal drugs in 1994 but nobody inquires as they knew nothing about it. Now they do, after illegal drugs become a national problem and worse, a global crisis.

This story refers to the Chinese Triads. Most of the documented information herein are based on the book Warlord of Crime by a US investigative journalist Gerard Fosner. He is the only writer allowed by the 14K Gang Triads to visit its headquarter in Hong Kong.

With the exception of the vast majority of hardworking and honest Chinese, I have no intent to slight them. As a matter of fact, they deserved my praises as the Chinese race and culture are at the forefront since the inception of written history.

This delves only on the unfortunate segment of the Chinese race- the Chinese Triads. They have a systematic and vicious control of large, illicit empires in the criminal world from the East to the West. The backbone of this organization is - illegal drugs.

The Triads are virtually unknown to the underworld business until the mid 50s. By then, Auguste Joseph Ricord, a Corsican boss of the French connection, was the king of heroin trade from Turkey to Marseilles and into New York until the mid-70s.

Heroin addiction, however, declined at the entry of the Latin-American Cocaine Cowboys in the underworld business. A research conducted by Posner revealed that at the time, Cocaine Cowboys earned enormous profit from this booming trade where “shabu” earned its street-name - poor man’s cocaine.

But not until the advent of the 80s when the Hong Kong Triads took control of the heroin trade in the US with their “China white” product coming from the Golden Triangle, the mountainous mist-shrouded areas in Southeast Asia fit for the cultivation of hush-poppy plants.

The Golden Triangle is consist of the Northern provinces of Siam (now Thailand), Eastern fringe of Laos and a broad stretch of Northeast Burma ( now Myanmar). The Chinese are also credited for conversion of Hong Kong as the third-largest financial center after New York and London.

Hong Kong has become a melting pot of world’s businesses and had the world’s most profitable bank – the Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank. The 14K Triads is the most dominant gang in Hong Kong, a British colony, before it was returned to Mainland China in July 1997. It has over 30,000 members in the colony alone.

A Hong Kong Police Superintendent said the Chinese Triads invented organized crime. And as he is said to have remarked, “They are the best at it. These secret societies have made it into big business and they are absolutely ruthless.”

This syndicate makes billions of dollars every year from regular businesses of organized crime – gambling, prostitution, extortion, loan sharking, protection rackets, guns-for-hire, up to political and civic corruption. But there is one thing that makes them unique – heroin!

Triads control most of world’s heroin supply coming from the Golden Triangle, a mountainous patch of land covering Laos, Thailand and Burma that can produce more than 70 percent of the world’s opium and heroin. This is an advantage the other criminal organizations don’t have.”

But where did these Chinese Triads originate? How did Hong Kong become a British colony and how did the Triads become warlord of crime in underworld business? How did they make the Mafia looked like a bunch of school kids in uniform when it comes to atrocities in criminal activities?


Next issue: Origin of The Triads.

Hole of Justice: The Rule of Law - on Laches

Hole of Justice: The Rule of Law - on Laches: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea RULE OF LAW – ON LACHES Laches is not concerned merely with lapse of time unlike prescription...

Hole of Justice: The Rule of Law - on Laches

Hole of Justice: The Rule of Law - on Laches: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea RULE OF LAW – ON LACHES Laches is not concerned merely with lapse of time unlike prescription...

Hole of Justice: The Rule of Law - on Laches

Hole of Justice: The Rule of Law - on Laches: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea RULE OF LAW – ON LACHES Laches is not concerned merely with lapse of time unlike prescription...

The Rule of Law - on Laches

Hole of Justice
By Peter G. Jimenea

RULE OF LAW – ON LACHES

Laches is not concerned merely with lapse of time unlike prescription. The latter deals with the facts of delay, laches deals with the effect of unreasonable delay, or failure/neglect for an unreasonable, unexplained length of time to do that by which, exercising due diligence could have been done earlier. (267 SCRA 339).

The failed P137M Housing Project of the Iloilo City government in Pavia, Iloilo, is a story that won’t go away. The construction of 413 units of low-cost houses for City Hall employees that started in 2001 has ended in 2009 without even a unit completed. Let this be a case study.

A case was file against the responsible city officials but it seems not good for the Office of the Ombudsman. It slept their as graft-investigators has failed to find a probable cause against the accused who messed-up with the taxpayers’ money. What a weak defense to save face!

Probable cause needs only to rest on evidence showing that most likely than not a crime has been committed. It demands more than suspicion and requires less than evidence to justify indictment. The unauthorized payment of P43M by the mayor to the contractor is already embraced in RA 3019.

But the decision approved and signed by Ombudsman Conchita Carpio Morales slams the Information accusing Mayor Jerry Trenas, Melchor Tan, Edwin Bravo, Catherine Tingson and Alex Trinidad for Violation of Sec. 3, Par (e) of RA 3019 as amended and ruled…it is HEREBY SET ASIDE.” Set aside only, nothing follows?

SEC. 16, ART. Iii of the 1987 Constitution reads: “All person shall have the right to a speedy disposition of their cases before all judicial or administrative bodies. Also SEC. 16, ART. IV of the 1973 Constitution likewise guarantees the right of all persons to a speedy disposition of their cases.

Finding probable cause is not the reason or justification of the Ombudsman for delay. Different weights cannot be assigned to different reasons or justifications invoked by the State, such as failure of the accused to follow up their pending cases with the office of the Ombudsman.

As respondent, it is not the duty of the accused to follow up the prosecution of the case. Conversely, it was the responsibility of the Office of the Ombudsman to expedite the same with reasonable timeliness in view of its mandate to promptly act on all complaints lodged before it.

A defendant has no duty to bring himself to trial; the State has that duty, as well as the duty of insuring that the trial is consistent with due process. A deliberate attempt to delay the trial in order to hamper or prejudice the defense should be weighted heavily against the State!

Jurisprudence dictates, “”A delay in the disposition of cases amounts to a denial of justice, brings the Court to disrepute and ultimately erodes public faith and confidence in the judiciary. (280 SCRA 637)

The SC finds the inordinate delay of more than six (6) years by the Ombudsman in resolving the criminal complaints against the petitioner to be violative of his Constitutionally guaranteed right to due process and to a speedy disposition of cases against him. (Anchangco vs. Ombudsman, 268 SCRA 301)

Lex reprobate moram – the law disapproves of delay. Thus, for the unjust delay of the Ombudsman, the Sandiganbayan approved to dismiss the graft case filed against Petitioner Rafael Coscolluela. The Ombudsman has failed in probing his case for 5 years. (G.R. No. 191411, July 15, 2013).

Delay is a two-edge sword. It is the government that must bear the burden of proving its case beyond reasonable doubt. What if the witnesses in the case have gone away without informing the litigants of the decision? Time passed makes it impossible for the government to carry its burden.

The Constitution and the Rules do not require impossibilities or extraordinary efforts, diligence or exertion from the courts or prosecutors, nor contemplate that such right shall deprive the State of the reasonable opportunity to fairly prosecute criminals.

As vanguard against corruption and bureaucracy, the Office of the Ombudsman must have a system of officials’ accountability to ensure that cases before it are resolved with reasonable dispatch to equally expose those who are responsible for its delays, as it ought to determine in this case.

Never had here been officials so derelict and irresolute in the performance of duty than the Ombudsman and Deputies. The case against (Mayor) now Cong. Jerry Trenas el al is already over 10 years and should have been dismissed by now. But why set aside only? Why not dismiss the case? Is the Office of the Ombudsman another syndicate we have to deal with? Just asking.


Hole of Justice: The Supreme Court Says

Hole of Justice: The Supreme Court Says: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea The Supreme Court on Delay “Injustice lies fairly in delayed decision than an erroneous one w...

The Supreme Court Says

Hole of Justice
By Peter G. Jimenea

The Supreme Court on Delay

“Injustice lies fairly in delayed decision than an erroneous one which can be appealed immediately. Delay causes prolonged anxiety to party litigants and could tie their assets and other properties in litigation.”

This explains why the Bill of Rights contains as it is in Art. III of the Constitution occupies a position of primacy to the fundamental law way above the articles on government powers. This includes the right of the accused for a speedy trial of his case. Jurisprudence dictates, lex reprobate moram – the law disapproves of delay.

The Court values liberty and will insist on the observance of basic Constitutional rights as a condition sine qua non against the extremely abusive investigative and prosecutor powers of the government. Summum jus, summum injuria – extreme enforcement of law may lead to injustice. (Berico vs CA, 225 SCRA 562).

Let’s take the case of Rafael Coscolluela, governor of Negros Occidental for three full terms from July 1992 to June 30, 2001. During his tenure of office, Edwin Nacionales served as his Special Projects Head, Jose Ma. Amugod as assistant and Ernesto Malvas as Provincial Health Officer.

On November 9, 2001, the Office of the Ombudsman Visayas received a letter-complaint dated November 7, 2001 from the People’s Graftwatch, requesting to investigate the anomalous purchase of medical and agricultural equipment for P20,000,000.00 which allegedly happened a month before Coscolluela stepped down from office.

Acting on the letter-complaint, the Case Building Team of the Ombudsman conducted its investigation. A Final Evaluation Report dated April 16, 2002, upgrading the complaint into a criminal case was filed. The respondents also filed their respective counter-affidavits.

On March 27, 2003, Graft- Investigation Officer Butch E. Cañares prepared a Resolution (March 27, 2003 Resolution), finding probable cause against the respondents for violation of Section 3(e) of RA 3019 “Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act” and recommended the filing of corresponding information.

He submits the same to Deputy Ombudsman for the Visayas Primo C. Miro for recommendation. Miro recommended approval of the Information on June 5, 2003.  Acting Ombudsman Orlando Casimiro approved it on May 21, 2009 and filed it at the Sandiganbayan on June 19, 2009. (Take note of the time lapsed)

On July 9, 2009, a Motion To Quash was filed with the Sandiganbayan Second Division by Coscolluela arguing, among others, that his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated. He learned of the Resolution and Information only on March 27, 2003, when they get a copy after its filing with the Sandiganbayan.

He cited that the criminal charges against him were resolved only after eight (8) years since the complaint was instituted,when the speedy disposition of his case is guaranteed under the Philippine Constitution. His co-respondents Nacionales, Malvas, and Amugod later adopted his motion.

An opposition to Motion to Quash filed by the Ombudsman on August 7, 2009, cited the Information originally dated March 27, 2003, has still to go through careful reviews and revisions before its final approval. And respondents never raised any objections regarding the purported delay in the proceedings during the interim.

The SANDIGANBAYAN SECOND DIVISION, however, recognizes the prejudice caused to petitioners by the lengthy delay in the proceedings against them. It said that it was the Ombudsman’s responsibility to expedite the same within the bounds of reasonable timeliness in view of its mandate to promptly act on all complaints lodged before it.

In the case of Barker vs. Wingo, the Court said that a defendant has no duty to bring himself to trial; the State has that duty as well as the duty of insuring that the trial is consistent with due process. So, it ordered the Sandiganbayan First Division to DISMISS the case against all the respondents. (G.R. No. 191411).

One Final Note: The SC finds the inordinate delay of more than six (6) years by the Ombudsman in resolving the criminal complaints against Petitioner to be violative of his Constitutionally guaranteed right to due process and a speedy disposition of the case against him. (Anchangco v. Ombudsman, 268 SCRA 301)


Monday, June 22, 2015

Hole of Justice: The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - Last Part

Hole of Justice: The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - Last Part: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea The Kuratong Baleleng Gang (Last Part - The Expendables) In previous issue of TDG, a gun...

Hole of Justice: The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - Last Part

Hole of Justice: The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - Last Part: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea The Kuratong Baleleng Gang (Last Part - The Expendables) In previous issue of TDG, a gun...

Hole of Justice: The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - First of Two Parts

Hole of Justice: The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - First of Two Parts: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea   The Kuratong Baleleng Gang (The Untouchables – first of two parts) On December 1995 ...

Hole of Justice: The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - First of Two Parts

Hole of Justice: The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - First of Two Parts: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea   The Kuratong Baleleng Gang (The Untouchables – first of two parts) On December 1995 ...

Hole of Justice: The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - First of Two Parts

Hole of Justice: The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - First of Two Parts: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea   The Kuratong Baleleng Gang (The Untouchables – first of two parts) On December 1995 ...

The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - Last Part


Hole of Justice
By Peter G. Jimenea

The Kuratong Baleleng Gang
(Last Part - The Expendables)

In previous issue of TDG, a gun-battle between the carnap-gang and the HPG, ANCAR, SOU/TF Limbas took place on July 2, 1996. Five (5) Kuratong members were arrested. During the tactical interrogation, one of the five suspects, Allen Pellazar was identified as “Dominador Amparo,” an army enlisted personnel.

Amparo, a member of the Kuratong Baleleng Gang jumped bail in a Robbery with Murder case in 1991 in Cebu City. During arrest he attempted to grab the service firearm of one SPO3 Armando Ballon but the latter parry his hand and shoot him twice on the chest. Still, he was able to escape from the police.

At the investigation room SPO3 Ballon arrived and after the suspect was made to undress, the investigators discovered that he bore two gunshot wounds on the chest confirming his identity not as Allen Pellazar but Dominador Amparo. After a few minutes, he cooperated to reveal the following;

He’s a member of the “Kuratong Baleleng-SOLIDO Gang from Ozamis City. They are waiting only for the contact of their leader Joel Arnan a.k.a. “Jojo” before they assemble at their rendezvous at Sucat Road near NAIA. They are provided by the formerly arrested Army Captain and a certain “Nonoy,” of G3, PA, Fort Bonifacio, with M-16, M-14, 45 Cal. Pistols and M203 Grenade launchers.

After the heist they again converge in a designated area where the weapons are collected and brought back to the PA headquarters. He claimed that four (4) to six (6) carjacked vehicles were often used during their operations and the loots are distributed only after the “BIG BOSSES” determine their shares.

Fortunately, an aunt of Jojo’s wife, volunteered to provide The SOU/TF Limbas “extensive knowledge” about the group, that Joel Arnan a.k.a. “Jojo” was an enlisted ex-Army Scout Ranger personnel who is also an escapee. As “Agent Joy” further narrate, a powerful politician and a number of retired and active Military and Police Generals are “brains” behind the group.

The ultimate motive of the KB-SOLIDO Gang was to raise “campaign fund” for the 1998 elections. They are well organized for having members in other government agencies such as the PNP, AFP, LTO and DILG. Agent Joy told the SOU/TF Limbas that December 15 is the birthday of “Jojo,” the KB-SOLIDO Gang leader and she will be attending the party.

From that occasion Joy was able to concretize the information of the SOU/TF Limbas. At about 4:00 pm of October 31, 1996, a 30-minute bloody gun-battle ensued between the police and the gang at the façade of Lexus Disco Club. Four TMG personnel were wounded, two police patrol cars were totally wrecked by the M203 grenade launchers but two gang members were also killed.

A dragnet was then set for the arrest of “Jojo,” leader of the KB-SOLIDO gang. On February 1, 1997 at about 2:30 pm, SOU/TF Limbas raided the gang’s hideout at the Greatland Subdivision, San Pedro, Laguna. Two gang members were caught by surprised. Recovered were cache of ammos, high-powered firearms, carjacked vehicles, MV plates and a motorcycle. “Jojo” was not in the house.

On February 2, 1997, all possible exits from “Jojo’s hideout were blocked after it was learned that he was inside limping due to motorcycle accident. Later, a man on a motorcycle was seen leaving the house, when arrested he turned out to be the advance party of the gang leader. But “Jojo” is still inside the house.

At about 1:00 pm, a man was seen speeding away from the house. A brief chase ensued and Joel Arnan aka “Jojo” was arrested. A search warrant was then issued that led to the recovery of the following; M-14 rifles, Baby Armalite rifles with AFP markings, automatic Carbines, 45 and 380 pistols, Beretta Sub-machinegun, Micro UZI, boxes of ammos, car plates, diplomat plate no. 19518 and assorted jewelries taken from the famous MILADY heist.

Surprisingly, “Jojo” did not stay long in San Pedro, Laguna Municipal Jail. A noise barrage was created by the inmates to facilitate his escape. But by the time, he and his Army Captain cohort were already considered expendable. “Jojo” was reported killed by police intelligence operatives along NAIA Road in Pasay, Metro Manila. Expendable indeed!

The trump up case against PCI Rernato G. Laurinaria, Commander of the SOU/TF Limbas was eventually dismissed by the Court. Agent Joy, unable to be included in the witness protection of the government dropped out of sight for fear of her life. The “Army Captain,” met his untimely death by poisoning so as not to divulge the BIG BOSSES of the syndicate. Expendable too!

The Kuratong Baleleng Gang - First of Two Parts


Hole of Justice
By Peter G. Jimenea
 
The Kuratong Baleleng Gang
(The Untouchables – first of two parts)

On December 1995 a highly syndicated violent carnap-kidnap-bank robbery-group, the Kuratong Baleleng Gang - Solido Group, emerged to sow terror in Metro Manila. Its heavily armed members forcibly take the vehicles from their lawful owners for use to other crimes.

The gang figured prominently in series of bank robbery, armoured van robberies, pawn shop and jewelry shop robberies, famous of which was the Milady jewelry shop robbery. Noted was the gang’s ferocity to gun down security guards and bank personnel without hesitation.

Then Police Chief Inspector Renato G. Laurinaria, Commander of the Highway Patrol Group (HPG) SOU/TF Limbas, formed a team of ANCAR Operatives to track down this gang. An “Order of Battle” (OB) was likewise undertaken to assist local police where carjacking and armed robberies are frequent.

On February 2, 1996, a brief running gun-battle ensued at Banawe St., Quezon City between TF Limbas operatives and members of the carjack-group. But traffic congestion hampered the pursuing police enabling the suspects to escape leaving behind their getaway carjacked-vehicle.

The recovery of the wanted motor vehicle gave the HPG/TF Limbas operatives a glimpse of the personal belongings left behind by the notorious group like pay-parking tickets, gas receipts, expressway entrance and exit tickets and receipts for unnecessary expenses.

But the ambush-slaying of two anti-carjacking TMG-NCR operatives at Rodriguez St., Quezon City on February 5, 1996, caused an animosity between PCI Laurinaria and then TMG Director P/Supt. Romeo Maganto. Laurinaria was relieved. But on June 8, 1996, the new TMG Director reinstalled him.

It paved the way for the discovery of unusual operation of the Kuratong Baleleng-Solido Gang. Three (3) gasoline receipts stood out most as they pointed that the notorious group had been frequenting a gasoline station located right inside Fort Bonifacio.

This enabled PCI Laurinaria to conclude that members of this group could either be active and dismissed military and/or police personnel. The TF Limbas ANCAR operatives were soon directed to focus their monitoring efforts inside the Fort Bonifacio.

At an unholy hour of the morning of June 24, 1996, a Mitsubishi Lancer GXLi with plate number TKA-706 reported as carjacked was spotted inside the parking area of the General Headquarters of Philippine Army in Fort Bonifacio, Makati City.

On the very same day at about 6:00 pm, an Army Captain was about to drive off the wanted vehicle when arrested. His arrest bolstered the suspicion that the AFP and the PNP have connection with this Kuratong Baleleng Gang and thus known as the “Solido Group.”

Before the SOU/TF Limbas investigators could extract vital information from the arrested army captain, his “mistah’s” at the TMG (now HPG) intervened and took custody of him. This denied ANCAR operatives their much needed information as to the existence of this notorious group.

On July 2, 1996, along Bangkal St., Makati City, at around 11:30 am, another brief gun-battle ensued between TF Limbas and the Kuratong Gang members. It ended with the capture of five gang members and recovery of two carjacked vehicles. A sketch map of the ASIAN bank in Buendia Ave. was also found.

At 4:00 pm of October 31, 1996, a bloody shoot-out between the group and the police took place at Timog Ave., Quezon City resulting to the total damage of two police vehicles by M203 grenade launchers fired by the gang. Four (4) TMGs have been wounded but two Kuratong members were killed and one captured.

Pressed as to who the ”BIG BOSSES” were,  the five arrested Kuratong Baleleng Gang members pointed to a Joel Arnan alyas ‘Jojo’ and the previously arrested Army Captain as the persons who could best identify the “BIG BOSSES” of the syndicate.

But the taking up of captured members alive, proved too costly for Laurinaria. As they were about to jump-off for the arrest of gang leader “Joel Arnan,” a “trump-up” case that has long been fabricated against him was immediately laid down for his arrest. Worse, the arresting team was led by P/General Romeo Maganto now assigned at the DILG.

Surprisingly, when PCI Laurinaria was relieved, the captured Kuratong  member was remitted to another jail and was reported later to have escaped. The records of the arrested Army Captain also disappeared from the file and can no longer be found.

 (Next: The Expendable))

Hole of Justice: The SC on Delay

Hole of Justice: The SC on Delay: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea   The Supreme Court on Delay “Injustice lies fairly in delayed decision than an erroneo...

Hole of Justice: The SC on Delay

Hole of Justice: The SC on Delay: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea   The Supreme Court on Delay “Injustice lies fairly in delayed decision than an erroneo...

Hole of Justice: The SC on Delay

Hole of Justice: The SC on Delay: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea   The Supreme Court on Delay “Injustice lies fairly in delayed decision than an erroneo...

Hole of Justice: The SC on Delay

Hole of Justice: The SC on Delay: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea   The Supreme Court on Delay “Injustice lies fairly in delayed decision than an erroneo...

Hole of Justice: The SC on Delay

Hole of Justice: The SC on Delay: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea   The Supreme Court on Delay “Injustice lies fairly in delayed decision than an erroneo...

The SC on Delay


Hole of Justice
By Peter G. Jimenea
 

The Supreme Court on Delay

“Injustice lies fairly in delayed decision than an erroneous one which can be appealed immediately. Delay causes prolonged anxiety to party litigants and could tie their assets and other properties in litigation.”

This explains why the Bill of Rights contains as it is in Art. III of the Constitution occupies a position of primacy to the fundamental law way above the articles on government powers. This includes the right of the accused for a speedy trial of his case. Jurisprudence dictates, lex reprobate moram – the law disapproves of delay.

The Court values liberty and will insist on the observance of basic Constitutional rights as a condition sine qua non against the extremely abusive investigative and prosecutor powers of the government. Summum jus, summum injuria – extreme enforcement of law may lead to injustice. (Berico vs CA, 225 SCRA 562).

Let’s take the case of Rafael Coscolluela, governor of Negros Occidental for three full terms from July 1992 to June 30, 2001. During his tenure of office, Edwin Nacionales served as his Special Projects Head, Jose Ma. Amugod as assistant and Ernesto Malvas as Provincial Health Officer.

On November 9, 2001, the Office of the Ombudsman Visayas received a letter-complaint dated November 7, 2001 from the People’s Graftwatch, requesting to investigate the anomalous purchase of medical and agricultural equipment for P20,000,000.00 which allegedly happened a month before Coscolluela stepped down from office.

Acting on the letter-complaint, the Case Building Team of the Ombudsman conducted its investigation. A Final Evaluation Report dated April 16, 2002, upgrading the complaint into a criminal case was filed. The respondents also filed their respective counter-affidavits.

On March 27, 2003, Graft- Investigation Officer Butch E. Cañares prepared a Resolution (March 27, 2003 Resolution), finding probable cause against the respondents for violation of Section 3(e) of RA 3019 “Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act” and recommended the filing of corresponding information.

He submits the same to Deputy Ombudsman for the Visayas Primo C. Miro for recommendation. Miro recommended approval of the Information on June 5, 2003.  Acting Ombudsman Orlando Casimiro approved it on May 21, 2009 and filed it at the Sandiganbayan on June 19, 2009. (Take note of the time lapsed)

On July 9, 2009, a Motion To Quash was filed with the Sandiganbayan Second Division by Coscolluela arguing, among others, that his constitutional right to a speedy trial was violated. He learned of the Resolution and Information only on March 27, 2003, when they get a copy after its filing with the Sandiganbayan.

He cited that the criminal charges against him were resolved only after eight (8) years since the complaint was instituted,when the speedy disposition of his case is guaranteed under the Philippine Constitution. His co-respondents Nacionales, Malvas, and Amugod later adopted his motion.

An opposition to Motion to Quash filed by the Ombudsman on August 7, 2009, cited the Information originally dated March 27, 2003, has still to go through careful reviews and revisions before its final approval. And respondents never raised any objections regarding the purported delay in the proceedings during the interim.

The SANDIGANBAYAN SECOND DIVISION, however, recognizes the prejudice caused to petitioners by the lengthy delay in the proceedings against them. It said that it was the Ombudsman’s responsibility to expedite the same within the bounds of reasonable timeliness in view of its mandate to promptly act on all complaints lodged before it.

In the case of Barker vs. Wingo, the Court said that a defendant has no duty to bring himself to trial; the State has that duty as well as the duty of insuring that the trial is consistent with due process. So, it ordered the Sandiganbayan First Division to DISMISS the case against all the respondents. (G.R. No. 191411).

One Final Note: The SC finds the inordinate delay of more than six (6) years by the Ombudsman in resolving the criminal complaints against Petitioner to be violative of his Constitutionally guaranteed right to due process and a speedy disposition of the case against him. (Anchangco v. Ombudsman, 268 SCRA 301)

 

Wednesday, June 3, 2015

Hole of Justice: The Unwanted Child

Hole of Justice: The Unwanted Child: Hole of Justice by Peter G. Jimenea   Unwanted Child and Abortion It is imperative for us to know on how life develops in the w...

The Unwanted Child


Hole of Justice
by Peter G. Jimenea 

Unwanted Child and Abortion

It is imperative for us to know on how life develops in the woman’s womb though a wanted or unwanted child. The issue on Reproductive Health Bill (RHB) has an unfinished debate between the proponents and Church devotees, thus, this article.

A book on “Mongolism” in 1959 sparked a non-stop debate between scientists and Church devotees in France. But in August 1969, its author Dr. Jerome Lejeune, was awarded by the American Society of Human Genetics the highest distinction ever granted to a geneticist.
Mongolism is also called “Down-Syndrome.” It affects one in every 650 new born babies around the world. Dr. Lejeune told thousands of families with affected child that their kids are created from the image of God and badly need love and affection.

But the American medical society during that time has already resorted to abort affected babies from being born. They say it is inhuman to allow the poor child to come into this world. Britain followed legalizing the screening for down-syndrome and its “treatment by abortion.”
Thus, the media battle shifted to abortion of “unwanted babies” in the two countries which share the same theory, that “a baby cannot legally become a person until it is born and the woman has the right to do what she wants with her body.” This is based on the pretext of scientific rigor, a point of view in which God has no place.

The good they say, it obviates the future child problem of the family as it also stops the birth of unwanted babies. The bad is, it interferes with material progress that a mongoloid is not created from the image of God, a child who could love Him to eternity.
Church leaders disagreed on the premise that life is sacred and shared by devotees who believe that sperm has already life in it. In essence, it is half-true because a television remains an idle TV set unless driven by a power or energy to show the pictures on the screen.

They argue that veterinarians can send dozen of cattle from Palawan to Mindanao using an envelope as carrier. True, but in that envelope are the bull’s sperm prepared for “artificial insemination,” to give birth to a dozen calves. This disproved the theory that the bull’s sperm alone has life in it.

That sperm will remain a sperm until it is injected into a cow’s womb for the development of an “embryo.” The embryo is a living thing in early stage formed by the inter-action of the male’s sperm inside the womb of the opposite sex by harmonious relationship or by-forced sexual intercourse.
Contraceptives and condom prevent an embryo’s development. This is not abortion as what the oppositions’ earlier claim hinted at. It only disallows the man’s egg to penetrate into the woman’s womb and form into an embryo. There is no killing or murder here!
The increasing population is not the main problem of the government. The very clear factor is the widening economic disparity between the rich and the poor caused by unequal distribution of wealth controlled by the few rich clans in this country.

Every time the poor ask from the government the basic services they rightfully deserved, they always end up badly-disillusioned. The sick and dying infants of poor mothers in government hospitals are counting. Why? There is lack of medicine and affordable health care for the poor people!.
If the sickly children of poor families survived, what promise of tomorrow awaits them? Unemployment is getting worse. Corruption is another.  The K to 12 designed of DepEd (added 2 years) for elementary to high school education is an added burden to poor families.
With the perceived number of out-of-school youth, I fear we are only producing more criminals than responsible citizens with this DepEd design. Look, the proliferation of illegal drugs is unstoppable. Why? A hungry stomach knows no law. This is now a national crisis and we are getting closer to Mexico!
Let us open our citizens’ awareness in having too many kids they cannot provide good health and proper education. It’s not yet too late. I stood pat defending the RH Bill because I know the prize of this effort is what we have been searching for – the TRUTH that will set us free!

Monday, June 1, 2015

Hole of Justice: Business Behind Bars

Hole of Justice: Business Behind Bars: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea Business Behind Bars   “In underworld business, there are betrayals, swindling, double cro...

Hole of Justice: Business Behind Bars

Hole of Justice: Business Behind Bars: Hole of Justice By Peter G. Jimenea Business Behind Bars   “In underworld business, there are betrayals, swindling, double cro...

Business Behind Bars


Hole of Justice
By Peter G. Jimenea

Business Behind Bars

 
“In underworld business, there are betrayals, swindling, double cross and cut-throat competition. But criminals have no way to approach the Court of law for the settlement of differences. Here, death is the most logical solution to all judicial problems.”

On April 29, 2015, an inmate (name withheld to protect the family) at the Bureau of Jail Management and Penology (BJMP) in Ungka District Jail at Jaro, Iloilo City, was reported to have committed suicide inside his cell.

Three days later, May 3, 2015, another inmate in the same compound was also reported to have committed suicide. But the autopsy report of the medico legal revealed otherwise, the two prisoners are victims of foul play. Other than traces of torture, one has a punctured wound on the head.

The two victims are facing drug charges and one is on schedule for hearing the next day. There were signs of torture in their bodies and worse, they were found positive of drugs during autopsy. Parents of the victims are asking justice but to date no inmate cooperates.

We cannot discount the possibility that the two victims have unpaid debts while still outside to the supplier of their vices. People hooked-on-drugs will always find ways to provide their addicted bodies with drugs and other substance to satisfy the need.

This reminds me of the arrest of Mexican drug lord Joaquin “El Chapo” Guzman of the dreaded Sinaloa Cartel on February 2015, in Northern Mexico. The powerful Mexican drug lord faces multiple indictments in the US Court. But until now Pres. Barack Obama has not yet requested his extradition.

The Sinaloa Cartel displaced the Carrillo Fuentes criminal organization in Ciudad Juárez. The court papers identify Gabino Salas Valenciano as El Chapo’s man who ran the cartel’s business in Ciudad Juárez. His job was to hire arms dealers, drug traffickers and assassins in the U.S. to eliminate clients who will not pay their debts.

On August 5, 2009, at Sierra Blanca, Texas inspection station, agents stopped two persons with trailer containing 303.9 kilos of marijuana. It was learned that a 30 year-old Sergio Saucedo owned them and was trying to smuggle from Mexico.

A month later, on September 3, a group of masked gunmen from the U.S.–broke into a house in Horizon City, in the suburbs of El Paso, and kidnapped Saucedo in a maroon-colored Ford Expedition. It is widely believed that El Chapo ordered the kidnapping.

Five days later after his kidnapping, on September 8, 2009, Saucedo’s body was found on the banks of the Rio Grande river semi-nude, with signs of torture and with cut-off hands placed over his chest, a sign of not-paying-debts.

A suspect in the kidnapping case when arrested eventually revealed that Saucedo had stolen more than 600 pounds of marijuana from the drug lord. It was Salas Valenciano, El Chapo’s man in Ciudad Juárez, who paid them $250,000 to deliver Saucedo.

El Chapo like other kingpins in the underworld business has a nice way to deliver his message. Through his man Salas Valenciano who ran the cartel business in Ciudad Juárez, they made their rule known to the underworld – “TILL DEBT DO US PART.”